JAMA's 2021 fraud against Nutrition, Zinc and Vitamin C: Good example of bogus research designed to control public opinion and promote drug profiteering and dependence

AMA (American Medical Association) uses its pathetic journal JAMA to blacklist nutrition and glorify drugs.

If I had it to do over again, I would have probably made this video review a bit shorter, but I was just a few days out from (supposedly) having COVID, and my mom had just died a few days previous…

The most common anti-nutrition strategies are:

1. Dose too low = ineffective

2. Dose too high or too low = ineffective + toxicity

   

   Dr Alex Vasquez 2021 Retraction Jama Bogus Vitamin D Covid

   691KB ∙ PDF file

   Download

   Download

3. Time too short

4. Treatment started too late when nothing would work, eg JAMA 2021 as reviewed previously

5. Wrong form of nutrients

6. Using slow-acting nutrients against fast-acting drugs without long-term follow-up to bias the findings in favor of drugs

7. Lack of cofactors necessary for nutrients to function

8. Changing the criteria of the study or using unusual criteria to reach the conclusion that the nutritional treatment did not work; then comparing this against drug-positive studies that used different criteria

See video above for discussion of this article; see my personal PDF with notes and criticisms included below, eg:

See my personal PDF with notes and critisisms included below