2016 RESEARCH PUBLICATION demonstrates “SARS-like WIV1-CoV” was “designed” and was “synthetically constructed” and was pathologic and “poised for human emergence”
Researchers also noted that the new “designed” and “synthetically constructed” viruses might escape vaccine-induced immunity, rendering vaccines ineffective.
Today’s post is a slight reformatting of the same theme posted to this newsletter in 2022 in order to provide context to the new publication in 2025 showing the creation of another modified virus—“a replicating recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV)” which has been genetically modified with the influenza “H5N1 virus” to create a transmissible “replicating” virus.
Main points:
They specifically called it GAIN OF FUNCTION
This research was FUNDED BY THE US GOVERNMENT
This research was FUNDED BY ANTONY FAUCI’S DEPARTMENT AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
This research was PERFORMED AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY IN CHINA
They “SYNTHETICALLY CONSTRUCTED” a virus that MUTATES TO AVOID ANTIBODY DEFENSES
USA NIH-funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) is plain to see in their published papers wherein they proclaimed that their coronavirus “SARS-like WIV1-CoV” was “designed” and was “synthetically constructed” and was pathologic and “poised for human emergence”
•SARS-like CoV = coronavirus causing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
•WIV1 = produced at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded by NIH
VIDEO [5hours;289minutes] 2015 European Congress on Antiviral Strategies and Immune Nutrition
SEE video *archived ABOVE* [5hours;289minutes]
Researchers also noted that the new “designed” and “synthetically constructed” viruses might escape vaccine-induced immunity, rendering vaccines ineffective.
Source: SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 2016 Mar 15;113(11):3048-53.doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517719113
Published on Pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26976607/ *
Full-text Published on Pubmed Central: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc4801244/ *archived screenshots below in case they try to erase this evidence
Press release: They were so proud of their new virus creation that they published a press release that was published on the news site ScienceDaily 14Mar2016—this serves as additional documentation and confirmation.
PDF provided here:



![VIDEO [5hours;289minutes] 2015 European Congress on Antiviral Strategies and Immune Nutrition](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!vy6F!,w_280,h_280,c_fill,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep,g_auto/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-video.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fvideo_upload%2Fpost%2F160680761%2F528db532-17fc-4962-a28f-8bedb4393e76%2Ftranscoded-00011.png)




I admire the work you’ve shared on melatonin and agree that your perspective there has been valuable. However, when it comes to COVID, I’m not fully convinced by your interpretation of the research. Published studies can be complex and are often misinterpreted outside of their scientific context.
If your goal is to bring clarity to the public, why not interview Dr. Fauci or another leading infectious disease expert to explain this report? Hearing directly from those most involved in the research would help ensure that your audience gets an accurate understanding, free from misrepresentation.
Respectfully,