British Medical Journal (BMJ) publishes Garbage (part3) America's FoxNews misinforms and misleads everyone on Nutrition by recycling Garbage

Major Medical Journals (BMJ) publish garbage misinformation that gets recycled and distributed by corporate media (CBS, FoxNews) to mislead and misinform everyone

Part 3, video included above

Major Medical Journals (BMJ) publish garbage misinformation that gets recycled and distributed by corporate media (CBS, FoxNews) to mislead and misinform everyone; useful [medical] idiots endorse their own ignorance so that the public will believe it.

I estimate that the IQ of the general population would increase by at least 5 points if FoxNews collapsed.

Fish oil supplements linked to greater first-time heart attack risk in study: ‘Not universally good or bad. Cardiologist, dietitians share cautions, tips on fish oil supplements and new study: ‘More isn’t always better’ By Melissa Rudy Fox News Published May 23, 2024 7:15pm EDT Updated May 26, 2024 5:29pm EDT https://www.foxnews.com/health/fish-oil-supplements-linked-greater-first-time-heart-attack-risk-not-universally-good-bad

Failures in this BMJ article:

  1. Used unreliable survey data; nutrition/diet recall data is notoriously unreliable but is completely absurd to think that the general population can self-select a competent n3 product providing optimal amounts of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid; most doctors and pharmacists don’t know what these are, let alone proper dosing; this was not a randomized controlled blinded study using proven/confirmed products-interventions

  2. Treatment was self-directed, self-selected, self-administered with no confirmation and no supervision; this was not a randomized controlled blinded study using proven/confirmed products-interventions

  3. Never administered fish oil; this was not a randomized controlled blinded study using proven/confirmed products-interventions

  4. Never qualified product potency, purity, absorption

  5. No dose-response relationship can be reported

  6. Never quantified compliance, effectiveness

  7. Never measured n3 index (ratio of n3 to n6)

  8. Reported Risk/Hazard ratios are small and conflicting

  9. Questionable funding by [injection] maniac

  10. Unusual disease model that proved questionable/unreliable

Share

Share

Part 1

Part 2

DrV’s Newsletter, Notes, Essays, Articles, Videos, and Book Chapters is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.