British Medical Journal (BMJ) publishes Garbage (part3) America's FoxNews misinforms and misleads everyone on Nutrition by recycling Garbage

Major Medical Journals (BMJ) publish garbage misinformation that gets recycled and distributed by corporate media (CBS, FoxNews) to mislead and misinform everyone

Part 3, video included above

Major Medical Journals (BMJ) publish garbage misinformation that gets recycled and distributed by corporate media (CBS, FoxNews) to mislead and misinform everyone; useful [medical] idiots endorse their own ignorance so that the public will believe it.

I estimate that the IQ of the general population would increase by at least 5 points if FoxNews collapsed.

Fish oil supplements linked to greater first-time heart attack risk in study: ‘Not universally good or bad. Cardiologist, dietitians share cautions, tips on fish oil supplements and new study: ‘More isn’t always better’ By Melissa Rudy Fox News Published May 23, 2024 7:15pm EDT Updated May 26, 2024 5:29pm EDT https://www.foxnews.com/health/fish-oil-supplements-linked-greater-first-time-heart-attack-risk-not-universally-good-bad

Failures in this BMJ article:

  1. Used unreliable survey data; nutrition/diet recall data is notoriously unreliable but is completely absurd to think that the general population can self-select a competent n3 product providing optimal amounts of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid; most doctors and pharmacists don’t know what these are, let alone proper dosing; this was not a randomized controlled blinded study using proven/confirmed products-interventions

  2. Treatment was self-directed, self-selected, self-administered with no confirmation and no supervision; this was not a randomized controlled blinded study using proven/confirmed products-interventions

  3. Never administered fish oil; this was not a randomized controlled blinded study using proven/confirmed products-interventions

  4. Never qualified product potency, purity, absorption

  5. No dose-response relationship can be reported

  6. Never quantified compliance, effectiveness

  7. Never measured n3 index (ratio of n3 to n6)

  8. Reported Risk/Hazard ratios are small and conflicting

  9. Questionable funding by [injection] maniac

  10. Unusual disease model that proved questionable/unreliable

Share

Share

Part 1

British Medical Journal (BMJ) publishes Garbage: VIDEO REVIEW and ANALYSIS of Chen's "Regular use of fish oil supplements and course of cardiovascular diseases" in BMJ Medicine May 2024

British Medical Journal (BMJ) publishes Garbage: VIDEO REVIEW and ANALYSIS of Chen's "Regular use of fish oil supplements and course of cardiovascular diseases" in BMJ Medicine May 2024

1. Test your expertise and critical thinking and critical reading skills! You should be able to find at least 6 (six) faults with this paper that disqualify any supposed utility of this “peer-reviewed research.” Here, I have provided the PDF and the link to the BMJ website: https://bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000451

Part 2

You can help liberate people from the Pharmaceutical Echo Chamber = the false reality of pseudomedicine and pseudosociety

You can help liberate people from the Pharmaceutical Echo Chamber = the false reality of pseudomedicine and pseudosociety

Final version of video included above + also posted at my new YouTube channel I told you yesterday (see video) that this new BMJ MEDICINE article on fish oil 1) provided zero information of any validity and that because it was neutral and therefore controversial that

DrV’s Newsletter, Notes, Essays, Articles, Videos, and Book Chapters is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.