Playback speed
×
Share post
Share post at current time
0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

Capitalizing on the cash crop of lost children (1) selling them a lifelong cocktail of sex-change hormones

children have gained “rights” to make major decisions, as long as those “affirmative rights” benefit the profitability and hegemony of the medical-pharma complex.

1. Historical and international tradition of protecting children

Historically and internationally across nearly all cultures, children are recognized as not having the full mental capacities of adults, specifically for more complex decisions and those that have delayed consequences. This recognition is reflected in biology and neuroanatomy insofar as the brain as a physical organ is not fully formed (eg, syntaptic interconnections) at least until the late teens and early 20s.

As such, all societies have placed restrictions on children’s ability to engage in potentially dangerous behaviors and life-altering decisions as children essentially need protection from themselves and their immature thought processes and impulsiveness until they have enough brain capacity and social-emotional experience to have reflection and perspective to make better decisions. For most of history, children have been blocked and protected from such irrational consequences by laws and by the requirement that important decisions are held by their parents until such children are progressively allowed to make autonomous decisions with age and experience. For example in the United States, children are allowed progressively greater opportunities and responsibilities as they get older and gain experience; children aren’t allowed to drive until age 16, not allowed to vote or participate in the military until age 18—the age of legal adulthood, and not allowed to purchase/drink alcoholic beverages until age 21.

Share

2. New “rights” for children as long as those rights profit the medical-pharma complex

Progressively over the past few years, underage/immature/underdeveloped children have gained “rights” to make major decisions, as long as those “affirmative rights” benefit the profitability and hegemony of the medical-pharma complex.

  1. Children now have the “right” to request vaccination, but they don’t have the right to refuse vaccination. In either case, they have no comprehension of immunology and microbiology, nor of the consequences such as neuroinflammation and autoimmunity.

  2. Children now have the “right” to request obesity surgery, but they don’t have the right to have playtime during school hours.

  3. Children now have the “right” to request sex-change surgery and hormones even with zero comprehension of the consequences involved.

3. Administering estrogens to biological XY males is going to create a tidal wave of iatrogenic breast cancers and prostate cancers.

Share

American College of Pediatricians denounces pediatric gender profiteering by American Medical Association (AMA), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Endocrine Society, American Psychological Association

See video clip above, and wonder why the only salvation for children and common sense is a so-called “fringe group” of pediatricians.

DrV’s Newsletter, Notes, Essays, Articles, Videos, and Book Chapters is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

0 Comments
DrV’s Newsletter, Notes, Essays, Articles, Videos, and Book Chapters
Healthy Thinking (substack) with DrV
Notes, book chapters, essays and videos related to health, nutrition, medicine, society and politics