AMA (American Medical Association) uses its pathetic journal JAMA to blacklist nutrition and glorify drugs.
If I had it to do over again, I would have probably made this video review a bit shorter, but I was just a few days out from (supposedly) having COVID, and my mom had just died a few days previous…
The most common anti-nutrition strategies are:
Dose too low = ineffective
Dose too high or too low = ineffective + toxicity
Time too short
Treatment started too late when nothing would work, eg JAMA 2021 as reviewed previously
Wrong form of nutrients
Using slow-acting nutrients against fast-acting drugs without long-term follow-up to bias the findings in favor of drugs
Lack of cofactors necessary for nutrients to function
Changing the criteria of the study or using unusual criteria to reach the conclusion that the nutritional treatment did not work; then comparing this against drug-positive studies that used different criteria
See video above for discussion of this article; see my personal PDF with notes and criticisms included below, eg:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (AMA, JAMA) publishes unethical antiscientific garbage to mislead the public and doctors away from nutrition and toward drug sales and dependency
General Summary: AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (AMA) is a for-profit organization to optimize physician salaries and drug sales; AMA uses its "scientific journal" Journal of the AMA (JAMA) to publish fake science to mislead and misinform doctors, the media, and the general public away from nutrition and toward drugs, injections and surgery as the solutio…
