SARS-CoV-2 avoids Antibody Neutralization by spreading through Cell-to-Cell Transmission, thereby making forced injections look stupider
SARS-CoV-2 avoids Antibody Neutralization by spreading through Cell-to-Cell Transmission, thereby making forced injections look stupider
Key quote: “…cell-to-cell transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is refractory to inhibition by neutralizing antibody or convalescent sera of COVID-19 patients.”
Key quote: “…cell-to-cell transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is refractory to inhibition by neutralizing antibody or convalescent sera of COVID-19 patients.”
Publication: Zeng et al. SARS-CoV-2 spreads through cell-to-cell transmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2022 Jan (1) e2111400119; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111400119 PDF provided below
Summary: SARS-CoV-2 virus spreads by cell-to-cell transmission thereby avoiding exposure to antibodies, thereby making forced vaccination appear scientifically and mechanistically absurd; this is the type of basic science research that should have been performed *prior* to vaccine development because this research (which could have been anticipated based on known behavior of other enveloped viruses such as Herpes, HIV, and HCV) shows that antibodies induced by vaccines are unlikely to provide major benefit and thus that other means of prevention and treatment (such as the use of vitamin D to increase production of interferon) should be prioritized.
Innovation and Limitations: This is a well performed and complex study that used multiple models and subexperiments to obtain data that is reliable and consistent with the same established-accepted mode of transmission used by other viruses such as Herpes, HIV, HCV, and Ebola; I suppose that some skeptic could criticize the data for being in vitro but that would be a very selective negation unless applied to the other viruses mentioned that have been accepted to use the exact same mechanism; in other words: this research simply established that this enveloped virus behaves in the same manner as other enveloped viruses, which is nice to know but certainly could have been predicted before the reckless mandate of forced injections which are unlikely to provide interference with this mechanism of viral pathogenesis.
Implications for clinical therapy/prevention: Injected vaccines are unlikely to provide major benefit against a mucosal virus that spreads by cell-to-cell transmission because the virus is not physically available for antibody binding (as would be the case if the virus spread via viremia).
Implications for science and policy: This is the type of research that should have been conducted *before* the vaccines were released for public use and then inappropriately forced upon millions of otherwise healthy people. Injected vaccines induce IgM and IgG antibodies which 1) do not protect mucosal surfaces where the virus is obtained and transmitted therefore these vaccines cannot inhibit infection nor transmission, and 2) cannot interfere with cell-to-cell transmission.
