[PopularizingVulnerability≠PowerVIDEO4of5] Contrasting the Social Value of 1) Embracing Vulnerability, vs 2) Antiviral Nutrition in the time of Pandemic

Vulnerability versus Antiviral Nutrition

Here in a 5-part series, I am using Dr Brené Brown’s 2011 TED presentation "The Power of Vulnerability" as a discussion piece critiqued 1) on its own merit, and 2) within the context of the ongoing plandemic disempowerment “Great [TechnoGlobalist] Reset.”

I think that her video exemplifies how some ideas are made popular (with more than 100MILLION VIEWS) to fit the TechnoGlobalist agenda (they want people to feel vulnerable) whereas other ideas such as Antiviral Nutrition and non-pharmaceutical disease prevention and treatment are marginalized, censored, and ignored.

Ideas are “selected for popularization”—they don’t simply become popular on their own merit, nor are some great ideas sidelined by chance.

Some ideas fit the dominant paradigm and are pushed into popularity to further serve and strengthen the dominant/emerging paradigm.

Let’s compare ~20 minutes of

1) Dr Vasquez advocating ANTIVIRAL NUTRITION, versus

2) Dr Brown advocating vulnerability.

VIDEO Antiviral Nutrition Summary 2020 Remastered 2021

VIDEO 2 of 5: VULNERABILITY vs LEADERSHIP

[Vulnerability≠Power VIDEO 1 of 5] Was "The Power of Vulnerability" popularized to disempower/depower the population in preparation for the TechnoGlobalist agenda?