Viruses as Scapegoats: The Example of Zika and How FEAR OF THE MISUNDERSTOOD is Leveraged for Political Power and Corruption Cover-up
The single most important tool for recognizing emotional/political/social manipulation is the simple observation of inconsistency.
You can’t be manipulated on a topic that you know well.
But if you don’t really understand a given topic, then someone might mislead or manipulate you—or play on your emotions—related to that topic.
And so it is with viruses and viral infections—among the most miscommunicated topics in all of medicine, science, public policy and—now over the past few years—politics. Viral infections remain an enigma to most people, including most doctors and certainly all politicians, essentially none of whom have ever studied Microbiology, Immunology, Pharmacology, Nutrition, nor Pathology. The study of all of these topics is essential for the understanding of viral infections within a multiperspectival comprehension, but it is not necessary nor sufficient for the observation/recognition of political manipulation. As I have said before, the single most important tool for recognizing emotional/political/social manipulation is the simple observation of inconsistency.
Our current international political takeover is adorned with fakery and inconsistency at every facet.
The description of the problem changes every every week and defies all previous norms in science, medicine, and public health:
Faked/inconsistent NUMBERS: The numbers are faked, and everyone knows they are faked, because even the politicians occasionally admit that the numbers are faked. They openly use fake laboratory methods, fake diagnostic criteria, and fake death-attributions to inflate the numbers.
Faked/inconsistent SOLUTIONS: The solutions are faked, and everyone knows they are faked because they consistently don’t work at any medical level (e.g., fewer cases, less transmission) or social level (e.g., even people who have the treatment have to live with restrictions and muzzles).
Faked/inconsistent SAFETY: The problems caused by the proposed solutions are hidden. If you talk about the problems and consequences from the treatment on social media then you are at high risk of being censored, banned, deplatformed, blacklisted or even added to a list of hate groups.
Faked/inconsistent RESPONSIBILITY: Politicians tell you that it is your personal responsibility to receive experimental drugs but then they shield the makers of those experimental drugs from any legal or financial responsibility.
Faked/inconsistent HOSPITAL OVERRUN: Politicians and the press cry about hospitals being overrun with infections at the same time we see that hospitals are closing due to lack of activity and entire hospital systems are firing the same doctors and nurses previously hailed as heroes.
Faked/inconsistent EFFECTIVENESS: The effectiveness of the official solutions is inflated.
Faked/inconsistent PRIORITIES FOR SELECTING TREATMENTS: Low-cost highly-effective treatments are suppressed, so that the only officially-endorsed solutions are those connected with mega-profits and unprecedented social control (i.e., the digital/implanted passport and social credit system).
Faked/inconsistent ORIGINS: In the same week that the media marvels at the lack of infection in Africa, a “new variant” supposedly originates from Africa—so the same region with an amazing lack of disease activity is supposedly to blame for the global increase in disease activity.
Faked/inconsistent MECHANISMS: Politicians incite fear about “virus mutations” at the same time they approve an experimental new drug that causes more virus mutations—so you are supposed to be afraid of natural viral mutations but then you’re supposed to endorse and cheer a high-profit drug that causes drug-induced viral mutations.
Faked/inconsistent standards for TRUTH AND EXPERTISE: The doctors and researchers who understand virus infections and their safe effective low-cost management are exactly the people who are being censored at this time of a supposed pandemic viral infection. Meanwhile billionaires who have never studied anything related to the topic are allowed to dictate international healthcare policy.
VIRUS SCAPEGOATING FOR SOCIAL-POLITICAL MANIPULATION: The Case of Zika
Zika virus (microcephaly) is the only viral infection in the entirety of medical history to coincide exclusively with the timeframe (2014-2016) and location (Olympics in Brazil) of the use of larvicides in drinking water
Zika virus was discovered 75 years ago, but the virus was never connected to the birth defect of microcephaly (abnormally small brain/skull/head) until an outbreak of microcephaly affected several thousand infants in approximately 2015, which was the exact same timeframe that Brazil was preparing to host the 2016 Olympic games. The government and government-paid/credentialed academicians investigated themselves and found themselves innocent and blamed the microcephaly on the virus scapegoat. Since then, Zika virus infections have disappeared as any cause of concern.
Zika virus scapegoating for politically-approved pesticide/Pyriproxyfen-induced microcephaly
Pyriproxyfen is an anti-mosquito larvicide that was distributed by a company linked with Monsanto and infused into the public water supply in the same timeframe as the Brazilian microcephaly outbreak, which was quickly then blamed on Zika virus infection. Notice the obvious inconsistency with the Zika scapegoating story as the cause of the microcephaly outbreak:
It never happened before: The virus was known for 75 years but was never associated with microcephaly,
It happened one time in one location exactly when and where the water supply was poisoned: The virus caused thousands of cases of microcephaly in and around the region hosting the 2016 Olympic games at the exact same time when the government put mosquito-killing larvicide in the public drinking water supply,
It never happened again but we are supposed to blame the virus: Zika disappeared from the news, especially as a cause of microcephaly, and this is entirely inconsistent with a legitimate viral infection.
Research support for the link between pyriproxyfen/larvicide and the microcephaly birth defect
“Exposure to pyriproxyfen induces reduction in brain and head size.”
“Exposure to pyriproxyfen induces reduction in brain and head size. Pyriproxyfen reduces thickness and cell density in the brain vesicle layers. Pyriproxyfen induces DNA damage and apoptosis in the brain vesicles.” [Pyriproxyfen exposure induces DNA damage, cell proliferation impairments and apoptosis in the brain vesicles layers of chicken embryos. Toxicology 2021 Dec 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152998]
Pyriproxyfen… application during development causes microcephaly.
Pyriproxyfen is a juvenile hormone analog, which has been shown to be cross reactive with retinoic acid, part of the mammalian regulatory system for neurological development, whose application during development causes microcephaly. This causal chain provides ample justification for pursuing a careful research effort on the role of pyriproxyfen in neurodevelopmental disorders. Counter to stated claims, existing studies of neurodevelopmental toxicity by Sumitomo, its manufacturer, provide some supportive evidence for neurodevelopmental toxicity including low brain weight in rat pups. The large-scale use of pyriproxyfen in Brazil and its coincidental timing with an increase in microcephaly cases should provide additional motivation. We believe that this evidence is strong enough to warrant an immediate cessation of pyriproxyfen application to Brazilian water supplies until additional research can be carried out on its neurodevelopmental toxicity. [A Possible Link Between Pyriproxyfen and Microcephaly. PLoS Curr. 2017 Nov ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760164 ]
